<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House &#8211; Episode 19 (Season 2): &#8220;House vs. God&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1210/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1210</link>
	<description>a blog of medicine, comics, television, science and other fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:50:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul cross</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1210/comment-page-2#comment-1166190</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1210#comment-1166190</guid>
		<description>If my last post upsets you, you can delete it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If my last post upsets you, you can delete it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul cross</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1210/comment-page-2#comment-1166187</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1210#comment-1166187</guid>
		<description>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1314725/As-researchers-prove-Red-Sea-really-parted--How-science-backs-Bibles-best-stories.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1314725/As-researchers-prove-Red-Sea-really-parted--How-science-backs-Bibles-best-stories.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1314725/As-researchers-prove-Red-Sea-really-parted&#8211;How-science-backs-Bibles-best-stories.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4/25/06 House: House vs. God &#171; CrimeNe.ws back up</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1210/comment-page-2#comment-1162571</link>
		<dc:creator>4/25/06 House: House vs. God &#171; CrimeNe.ws back up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1210#comment-1162571</guid>
		<description>[...] Dr. Scott&#8217;s Prognosis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dr. Scott&#8217;s Prognosis [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriela</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1210/comment-page-2#comment-1160221</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1210#comment-1160221</guid>
		<description>&quot;The show didn’t really take sides with the religion debate&quot;

Jen
I am sorry but I can&#039;t resist this one. The fact that the kid (and his dad) are adamant he is not operated on to remove the brain tumor pretty much speaks for itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The show didn’t really take sides with the religion debate&#8221;</p>
<p>Jen<br />
I am sorry but I can&#8217;t resist this one. The fact that the kid (and his dad) are adamant he is not operated on to remove the brain tumor pretty much speaks for itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Turtle</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1210/comment-page-2#comment-1095554</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Turtle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 05:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1210#comment-1095554</guid>
		<description>@ Dr. Scott:

&quot;The virus-causing-a-tumor-remission makes since theoretically....&quot;

Did you perhaps mean, &quot;makes *sense* theoretically&quot;? 

(I hate the introduction of spell-check, which can&#039;t distinguish homophones or other misuses of words that are nonetheless correctly spelled. It&#039;s become a substitute for proofreading. [/soapbox])

Re: Atheist = miserable: 

There are lots of happy atheists. But the ones who are not happy don&#039;t have what Karl Marx (with whom I disagree on everything else) called &quot;the opiate of the masses&quot;.  (Religion). Religious people who are miserable can find comfort in their delus -- strike that, in their faith. For House, Vicodin is the opioid of the messes. (wow, I&#039;m on a roll now! ;) 

The funniest part was the &quot;Viewer discretion advised&quot; warning. Usually, it says no more, or makes reference to &quot;adult situations&quot; or language. This one said, &quot;Religious sensibilities may be contained in tonight&#039;s episode.&quot; 

&quot;contained&quot;? I think they meant &quot;offended&quot;, and it would be a fair warning to those who&#039;ve never seen the show and know nothing of House&#039;s long history of antagonism and mockery of religion. (What is &quot;sensibilities are contained&quot; supposed to mean? Sheesh....)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dr. Scott:</p>
<p>&#8220;The virus-causing-a-tumor-remission makes since theoretically&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Did you perhaps mean, &#8220;makes *sense* theoretically&#8221;? </p>
<p>(I hate the introduction of spell-check, which can&#8217;t distinguish homophones or other misuses of words that are nonetheless correctly spelled. It&#8217;s become a substitute for proofreading. [/soapbox])</p>
<p>Re: Atheist = miserable: </p>
<p>There are lots of happy atheists. But the ones who are not happy don&#8217;t have what Karl Marx (with whom I disagree on everything else) called &#8220;the opiate of the masses&#8221;.  (Religion). Religious people who are miserable can find comfort in their delus &#8212; strike that, in their faith. For House, Vicodin is the opioid of the messes. (wow, I&#8217;m on a roll now! ;) </p>
<p>The funniest part was the &#8220;Viewer discretion advised&#8221; warning. Usually, it says no more, or makes reference to &#8220;adult situations&#8221; or language. This one said, &#8220;Religious sensibilities may be contained in tonight&#8217;s episode.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;contained&#8221;? I think they meant &#8220;offended&#8221;, and it would be a fair warning to those who&#8217;ve never seen the show and know nothing of House&#8217;s long history of antagonism and mockery of religion. (What is &#8220;sensibilities are contained&#8221; supposed to mean? Sheesh&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cookie</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1210/comment-page-2#comment-1046149</link>
		<dc:creator>Cookie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 07:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1210#comment-1046149</guid>
		<description>How could Wilson stand such a friend....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could Wilson stand such a friend&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eva</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1210/comment-page-2#comment-901258</link>
		<dc:creator>Eva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 03:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1210#comment-901258</guid>
		<description>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-10817277

Herpes virus used to treat cancer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-10817277" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-10817277</a></p>
<p>Herpes virus used to treat cancer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vick</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1210/comment-page-2#comment-804878</link>
		<dc:creator>Vick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1210#comment-804878</guid>
		<description>The trolls some posts above made me sad, as the comments here are usually quite enjoyable to read, and I make a point to go through them as they often provide some more insight as addendum to Scott&#039;s comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trolls some posts above made me sad, as the comments here are usually quite enjoyable to read, and I make a point to go through them as they often provide some more insight as addendum to Scott&#8217;s comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jmo</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1210/comment-page-2#comment-758786</link>
		<dc:creator>Jmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1210#comment-758786</guid>
		<description>While House himself is consistent with the &quot;miserable atheist&quot; stereotype, Cameron is not. I think that helps show that House is just miserable because he&#039;s miserable. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While House himself is consistent with the &#8220;miserable atheist&#8221; stereotype, Cameron is not. I think that helps show that House is just miserable because he&#8217;s miserable. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chic</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1210/comment-page-2#comment-686815</link>
		<dc:creator>Chic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1210#comment-686815</guid>
		<description>To KKC -- MGSomebody is right. I usually watch the show in English and with English subtitles, and early on when they mentioned somebody&#039;s temperature, I had no idea whether the number they just said was high fever or just a slight elevation. I&#039;m beginning to learn, though -- by now I can tell that 103 is really high, but I cannot relate to it. For us, the thermometer ranges from 35 to 42 degrees Celsius. Of course, this was covered in English classes, but it&#039;s not that easy to calculate in a split second. Actually I&#039;m quite proud that I&#039;m able to think in miles, yards, feet and inches when reading or watching English stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To KKC &#8212; MGSomebody is right. I usually watch the show in English and with English subtitles, and early on when they mentioned somebody&#8217;s temperature, I had no idea whether the number they just said was high fever or just a slight elevation. I&#8217;m beginning to learn, though &#8212; by now I can tell that 103 is really high, but I cannot relate to it. For us, the thermometer ranges from 35 to 42 degrees Celsius. Of course, this was covered in English classes, but it&#8217;s not that easy to calculate in a split second. Actually I&#8217;m quite proud that I&#8217;m able to think in miles, yards, feet and inches when reading or watching English stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

