<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 52 #16:  A Medical Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1354/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1354</link>
	<description>a blog of medicine, comics, television, science and other fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:50:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blog@Newsarama &#187; Meanwhile&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1354/comment-page-1#comment-8073</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog@Newsarama &#187; Meanwhile&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1354#comment-8073</guid>
		<description>[...] Polite Dissent&#8217;s Scott reviews the science behind the Rat Poison Bomb in 52 #16. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Polite Dissent&#8217;s Scott reviews the science behind the Rat Poison Bomb in 52 #16. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor E</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1354/comment-page-1#comment-8057</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1354#comment-8057</guid>
		<description>Whether or not the bomb would work doesn&#039;t matter. What matters is that the terrorists THINK it would work. And I suppose that Renee thinks that the terrorists think it would work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether or not the bomb would work doesn&#8217;t matter. What matters is that the terrorists THINK it would work. And I suppose that Renee thinks that the terrorists think it would work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1354/comment-page-1#comment-8054</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 19:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1354#comment-8054</guid>
		<description>James, 
I think you&#039;re right.  The profuse bleeding was likely from the trauma of the explosion and not any effect of the rat poison.

Walt,
I ran across that as well when researching this post.  There has also been at least one case with an HIV+ suicide bomber.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/2002/06/061802.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This article&lt;/a&gt; mentions both briefly, as well as the rat poison scare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,<br />
I think you&#8217;re right.  The profuse bleeding was likely from the trauma of the explosion and not any effect of the rat poison.</p>
<p>Walt,<br />
I ran across that as well when researching this post.  There has also been at least one case with an HIV+ suicide bomber.  <a href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/2002/06/061802.html" rel="nofollow">This article</a> mentions both briefly, as well as the rat poison scare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt moffett</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1354/comment-page-1#comment-8053</link>
		<dc:creator>walt moffett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1354#comment-8053</guid>
		<description>While a rat poison bomb won&#039;t work, here is something in the dreadful realm. I recall a letter New England Journal of Medicine, describing a case of Hepatitis B caused by a bone fragment of the bomber acting as sharpnel.  A pubmed search using hepatitis bone fragment pulls up about 11 articles.  Much scary than a rat poison/ricin/whatever bomb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While a rat poison bomb won&#8217;t work, here is something in the dreadful realm. I recall a letter New England Journal of Medicine, describing a case of Hepatitis B caused by a bone fragment of the bomber acting as sharpnel.  A pubmed search using hepatitis bone fragment pulls up about 11 articles.  Much scary than a rat poison/ricin/whatever bomb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Nicoll</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1354/comment-page-1#comment-8052</link>
		<dc:creator>James Nicoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1354#comment-8052</guid>
		<description>&quot;It is not a fast acting drug and there would be no “bleeding profusely” in the ER — at least not from the rat poison.&quot;

I wonder if it is at all possible that the profuse bleeding the alleged witness report could in some way be related to the victims having been near an explosion, in particular the sort that produces shrapnel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is not a fast acting drug and there would be no “bleeding profusely” in the ER — at least not from the rat poison.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wonder if it is at all possible that the profuse bleeding the alleged witness report could in some way be related to the victims having been near an explosion, in particular the sort that produces shrapnel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

