<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The S.C.R.U.B.S. System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politedissent.com/archives/147/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/147</link>
	<description>a blog of medicine, comics, television, science and other fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:50:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/147/comment-page-1#comment-850972</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 08:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/147#comment-850972</guid>
		<description>@chipsnopotatoes: the system is designed to penalize story arcs where certain characters appear without being really deeply invoved in the story. I believe the logic is that when those particular individuals are major characters, they&#039;re there for the purpose of being major characters that are integral to the storyline. In stories where they&#039;re minor characters, they&#039;re there for the purpose of Bat-angst or as &quot;Look! We put in X! X fans, rejoice!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@chipsnopotatoes: the system is designed to penalize story arcs where certain characters appear without being really deeply invoved in the story. I believe the logic is that when those particular individuals are major characters, they&#8217;re there for the purpose of being major characters that are integral to the storyline. In stories where they&#8217;re minor characters, they&#8217;re there for the purpose of Bat-angst or as &#8220;Look! We put in X! X fans, rejoice!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/147/comment-page-1#comment-438873</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/147#comment-438873</guid>
		<description>When I saw the acronym, I initially thought it stood for Screwy Crazy Ridiculous Unbearably Bad Science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw the acronym, I initially thought it stood for Screwy Crazy Ridiculous Unbearably Bad Science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chipsnopotatoes</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/147/comment-page-1#comment-420387</link>
		<dc:creator>chipsnopotatoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/147#comment-420387</guid>
		<description>um. not sure i understand the scoring on the sidekicks. how do you differentiate a characted being &quot;involved&quot; vs &quot;half the storyline&quot;? why is one higher than the other?

do you still use this rating system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um. not sure i understand the scoring on the sidekicks. how do you differentiate a characted being &#8220;involved&#8221; vs &#8220;half the storyline&#8221;? why is one higher than the other?</p>
<p>do you still use this rating system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/147/comment-page-1#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 20:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/147#comment-177</guid>
		<description>I still bet HUSH is higher.

Maybe I should add a &quot;may not be compatible with Elseworlds&quot;, but I&#039;m not sure DK2 is actually an Elseworlds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still bet HUSH is higher.</p>
<p>Maybe I should add a &#8220;may not be compatible with Elseworlds&#8221;, but I&#8217;m not sure DK2 is actually an Elseworlds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Berg</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/147/comment-page-1#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 16:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/147#comment-176</guid>
		<description>I was going to calculate the SCRUBS rating for DK2, but at +6 per character it must be somewhere far above 50.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to calculate the SCRUBS rating for DK2, but at +6 per character it must be somewhere far above 50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/147/comment-page-1#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 15:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/147#comment-175</guid>
		<description>6 points &lt;i&gt;per&lt;/i&gt; character, so Green Lantern, Aquaman, and Flash would be +18.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6 points <i>per</i> character, so Green Lantern, Aquaman, and Flash would be +18.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Berg</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/147/comment-page-1#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/147#comment-173</guid>
		<description>&quot;+6 points if any other JLA member is involved.&quot;

Is that +6 per character, or just +6 if one or more characters are involved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;+6 points if any other JLA member is involved.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that +6 per character, or just +6 if one or more characters are involved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/147/comment-page-1#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/147#comment-170</guid>
		<description>But that&#039;s the beauty of the system, with SC.R.U.B.S. you can adjust the modifiers to reflect your own tastes!!

&lt;strong&gt;H and David:&lt;/strong&gt;  Reduce the Batwoman penalty to +3, making her equivalent to Batgirl (Barbara Gordon); or to +2, making her the equivalent of Nightwing.

&lt;strong&gt;Rick: &lt;/strong&gt; Add this modifier to the Advanced SC.R.U.B.S.  list:
&lt;em&gt;Penciled by artist/artists whose best work was in &lt;b&gt;Grendel &lt;/b&gt; (+10)&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But that&#8217;s the beauty of the system, with SC.R.U.B.S. you can adjust the modifiers to reflect your own tastes!!</p>
<p><strong>H and David:</strong>  Reduce the Batwoman penalty to +3, making her equivalent to Batgirl (Barbara Gordon); or to +2, making her the equivalent of Nightwing.</p>
<p><strong>Rick: </strong> Add this modifier to the Advanced SC.R.U.B.S.  list:<br />
<em>Penciled by artist/artists whose best work was in <b>Grendel </b> (+10)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/147/comment-page-1#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 02:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/147#comment-169</guid>
		<description>All in good fun.  The DC Comics Present: Batman scored good and low, despite 2 Batmans and a number of villains, one new.  Nice system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All in good fun.  The DC Comics Present: Batman scored good and low, despite 2 Batmans and a number of villains, one new.  Nice system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/147/comment-page-1#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 20:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/147#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Huh, after reading City of Light, I see that it bucked your system.  That series was easily one of the worst Bat stories in the last few years and it only got an 18 on your system.  *shrug* nothing is perfect, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh, after reading City of Light, I see that it bucked your system.  That series was easily one of the worst Bat stories in the last few years and it only got an 18 on your system.  *shrug* nothing is perfect, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

