<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House &#8211; Episode 17 (Season 3): &#8220;Fetal Position&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1612/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1612</link>
	<description>a blog of medicine, comics, television, science and other fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:09:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sp3lly</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1612/comment-page-2#comment-1039547</link>
		<dc:creator>Sp3lly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1612#comment-1039547</guid>
		<description>Seem to me that in the 20th century, at least, it is a-theists that have been responsible by far for the most human slaughter; examples include Lenin, Stalin and Mao.  Add in Pol Pot, et al.  How many humans did they end up destroying?

Also, faith is not something that thrives on the lack of proof.  We act on the basis of faith (not proof) everyday.  

I do appreciate this episode as sort of a balance to the ones that are blatantly pro kill-the-fetus/parasite/tumor.

As for the show, I don&#039;t see how Cuddy&#039;s going with instinct (and against the odds) is any different than House doing that for the guy in the wheelchair, which Scott mentions in his summary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seem to me that in the 20th century, at least, it is a-theists that have been responsible by far for the most human slaughter; examples include Lenin, Stalin and Mao.  Add in Pol Pot, et al.  How many humans did they end up destroying?</p>
<p>Also, faith is not something that thrives on the lack of proof.  We act on the basis of faith (not proof) everyday.  </p>
<p>I do appreciate this episode as sort of a balance to the ones that are blatantly pro kill-the-fetus/parasite/tumor.</p>
<p>As for the show, I don&#8217;t see how Cuddy&#8217;s going with instinct (and against the odds) is any different than House doing that for the guy in the wheelchair, which Scott mentions in his summary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1612/comment-page-2#comment-903438</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1612#comment-903438</guid>
		<description>Apologies if this has been mentioned before, but:

House (during sugery): It&#039;s asystole, paddling&#039;s not going to do anything!
Cuddy: it&#039;s fine v-fib blah blah..

For the show to not only recognise that defibbing is not the way to treat flatlines, but to explicitly *say* so, I think the medicine deserves an A just for that.

And for the record, I totally agree with TC - don&#039;t get me started on how God is at best, an absent bully and at worst, an evil, malicious b*stard.
And btw, was it asystole? Because Cuddy shocked her back so it was presumably v-fib but it certainly looked like asystole.. Maybe that was the point, I don&#039;t know..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies if this has been mentioned before, but:</p>
<p>House (during sugery): It&#8217;s asystole, paddling&#8217;s not going to do anything!<br />
Cuddy: it&#8217;s fine v-fib blah blah..</p>
<p>For the show to not only recognise that defibbing is not the way to treat flatlines, but to explicitly *say* so, I think the medicine deserves an A just for that.</p>
<p>And for the record, I totally agree with TC &#8211; don&#8217;t get me started on how God is at best, an absent bully and at worst, an evil, malicious b*stard.<br />
And btw, was it asystole? Because Cuddy shocked her back so it was presumably v-fib but it certainly looked like asystole.. Maybe that was the point, I don&#8217;t know..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyMan</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1612/comment-page-2#comment-845518</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 21:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1612#comment-845518</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m fascinated by the number of people trashing the writers about the characters not being true to form.. Surely that was a large part of this episode - being about Mirror Syndrome - that the writers cleverly crafted each character to be mirroring another character. Whether this enriches each character, or highlights idiosyncrasies or foilbles... I found it amusing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m fascinated by the number of people trashing the writers about the characters not being true to form.. Surely that was a large part of this episode &#8211; being about Mirror Syndrome &#8211; that the writers cleverly crafted each character to be mirroring another character. Whether this enriches each character, or highlights idiosyncrasies or foilbles&#8230; I found it amusing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1612/comment-page-2#comment-758705</link>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1612#comment-758705</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m late to the party here, and I generally never post comments to blogs, but I couldn&#039;t let this one pass by. 

To Flyndaran:
&quot;House loudly claims to be an atheist, but he isn’t.
He quite obviously hates god and you can’t hate something that doesn’t exist. He provokes the religious in an attempt to be shown the way to believing. It’s irritating.&quot;

It&#039;s time to make another distinction: that between atheism and antitheism. I&#039;m an atheist, AND an antitheist, and I see House as the same. Antitheism is objection to religion in general. I not only disbelieve in a &quot;higher power,&quot; but I also object to religion, which I see as an age-old tool of escapism (both of reality and of responsibility) and of control and suppression by those in power of those who choose not to think freely.

I don&#039;t &quot;hate God&quot; and neither does House - he detests the foolish behavior that comes about by belief in God, as do I.

For what it&#039;s worth, I too &quot;poke the religious.&quot; I find their reactions amusing, particularly in adults whom I otherwise find to be intelligent and reasoning. Imagine it - a belief system that requires lack of proof - that actually thrives on it - that forbids testing or any dissent, that promotes ignorance (&quot;faith&quot;) as a virtue. It&#039;s simply laughable. It&#039;d be even more laughable if it wasn&#039;t the cause of most of the problems in the world. 

Remember: &quot;God&quot; is the cause of more and bloodier deaths than any other cause in human history.

Now back to your regularly-scheduled program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m late to the party here, and I generally never post comments to blogs, but I couldn&#8217;t let this one pass by. </p>
<p>To Flyndaran:<br />
&#8220;House loudly claims to be an atheist, but he isn’t.<br />
He quite obviously hates god and you can’t hate something that doesn’t exist. He provokes the religious in an attempt to be shown the way to believing. It’s irritating.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to make another distinction: that between atheism and antitheism. I&#8217;m an atheist, AND an antitheist, and I see House as the same. Antitheism is objection to religion in general. I not only disbelieve in a &#8220;higher power,&#8221; but I also object to religion, which I see as an age-old tool of escapism (both of reality and of responsibility) and of control and suppression by those in power of those who choose not to think freely.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t &#8220;hate God&#8221; and neither does House &#8211; he detests the foolish behavior that comes about by belief in God, as do I.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I too &#8220;poke the religious.&#8221; I find their reactions amusing, particularly in adults whom I otherwise find to be intelligent and reasoning. Imagine it &#8211; a belief system that requires lack of proof &#8211; that actually thrives on it &#8211; that forbids testing or any dissent, that promotes ignorance (&#8221;faith&#8221;) as a virtue. It&#8217;s simply laughable. It&#8217;d be even more laughable if it wasn&#8217;t the cause of most of the problems in the world. </p>
<p>Remember: &#8220;God&#8221; is the cause of more and bloodier deaths than any other cause in human history.</p>
<p>Now back to your regularly-scheduled program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meblue</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1612/comment-page-2#comment-671664</link>
		<dc:creator>Meblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1612#comment-671664</guid>
		<description>The medicine went over my head in this episode, which was just as well because I loved the schmaltz. I liked seeing Cuddy lack of objectivity as she fought for the baby (sorry! fetus!) as any mother would do, and how Emma was willing to risk her own life for it. I thought this was well played, as was House&#039;s insistence on terminating the baby ... sorry... fetus. I also liked the background soap. All well played.

Yes. Even so, I do wish they would get the medicine right (because when I *do* spot it it does detract from the episode, sometimes terribly so.) Why make stuff up when there are plenty of plausible conditions out there? Some posters argue it&#039;s drama, but if they&#039;re going to make stuff up, they might as well make up new organs.

One error I did catch: Giving the baby (sorry! fetus!) a paralytic was silly. In an ultrasound if the baby is moving around they wait half-an-hour for it to fall asleep. duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The medicine went over my head in this episode, which was just as well because I loved the schmaltz. I liked seeing Cuddy lack of objectivity as she fought for the baby (sorry! fetus!) as any mother would do, and how Emma was willing to risk her own life for it. I thought this was well played, as was House&#8217;s insistence on terminating the baby &#8230; sorry&#8230; fetus. I also liked the background soap. All well played.</p>
<p>Yes. Even so, I do wish they would get the medicine right (because when I *do* spot it it does detract from the episode, sometimes terribly so.) Why make stuff up when there are plenty of plausible conditions out there? Some posters argue it&#8217;s drama, but if they&#8217;re going to make stuff up, they might as well make up new organs.</p>
<p>One error I did catch: Giving the baby (sorry! fetus!) a paralytic was silly. In an ultrasound if the baby is moving around they wait half-an-hour for it to fall asleep. duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrEvil</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1612/comment-page-2#comment-650157</link>
		<dc:creator>DrEvil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1612#comment-650157</guid>
		<description>This episode would have been far better if Cuddy had actually solved the case without House but then the wrIters aren&#039;t that bright. : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode would have been far better if Cuddy had actually solved the case without House but then the wrIters aren&#8217;t that bright. : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medstudent</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1612/comment-page-2#comment-629576</link>
		<dc:creator>Medstudent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1612#comment-629576</guid>
		<description>The kidney symptoms CAN be linked with the heart ones if house was right about the rheumatic fever... Besides rheumatic heart disease, another possible consequence to group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis is post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis... Just a thought  (albeit delayed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kidney symptoms CAN be linked with the heart ones if house was right about the rheumatic fever&#8230; Besides rheumatic heart disease, another possible consequence to group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis is post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis&#8230; Just a thought  (albeit delayed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1999. michael clancy. &#171; minúsculas.jpg</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1612/comment-page-2#comment-527767</link>
		<dc:creator>1999. michael clancy. &#171; minúsculas.jpg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 14:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1612#comment-527767</guid>
		<description>[...] historia de la foto en la web de michael clancy y revisión del capítulo de house en polite dissent desde un punto de vista médico. la foto es mencionada por encima pero las revisiones médicas son [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] historia de la foto en la web de michael clancy y revisión del capítulo de house en polite dissent desde un punto de vista médico. la foto es mencionada por encima pero las revisiones médicas son [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flyndaran</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1612/comment-page-2#comment-527746</link>
		<dc:creator>Flyndaran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 12:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1612#comment-527746</guid>
		<description>Ridiculously late, and I know that no one will read this...
House loudly claims to be an atheist, but he isn&#039;t.

He quite obviously hates god and you can&#039;t hate something that doesn&#039;t exist.  He provokes the religious in an attempt to be shown the way to believing.  It&#039;s irritating.

As a born atheist, I don&#039;t like &quot;his kind&quot; grouped in with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ridiculously late, and I know that no one will read this&#8230;<br />
House loudly claims to be an atheist, but he isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>He quite obviously hates god and you can&#8217;t hate something that doesn&#8217;t exist.  He provokes the religious in an attempt to be shown the way to believing.  It&#8217;s irritating.</p>
<p>As a born atheist, I don&#8217;t like &#8220;his kind&#8221; grouped in with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brigitte</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1612/comment-page-2#comment-460293</link>
		<dc:creator>Brigitte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1612#comment-460293</guid>
		<description>First off, I&#039;m no medical expert, only a humble biologist, but something struck me as odd when I was watching this episode (a re-run, in Germany):

Wouldn&#039;t a bladder condition like that of the foetus lead to a severe Oligohydramnion (reduction of fluid in the amniotic sac)?

And wouldn&#039;t one of the first procedures done to a pregnant woman with health problems be the checking for a heartbeat of the foetus via ultrasound, which should have revealed the condition of the amniotic sac and therefore, the distended bladder immediately without all the guesswork?

Just my 2 cents...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, I&#8217;m no medical expert, only a humble biologist, but something struck me as odd when I was watching this episode (a re-run, in Germany):</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t a bladder condition like that of the foetus lead to a severe Oligohydramnion (reduction of fluid in the amniotic sac)?</p>
<p>And wouldn&#8217;t one of the first procedures done to a pregnant woman with health problems be the checking for a heartbeat of the foetus via ultrasound, which should have revealed the condition of the amniotic sac and therefore, the distended bladder immediately without all the guesswork?</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

