<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 10% Myth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1647/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1647</link>
	<description>a blog of medicine, comics, television, science and other fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:37:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robb</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1647/comment-page-1#comment-646719</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1647#comment-646719</guid>
		<description>From what I understand, 100% of the brain being used at a time is called an epileptic seizure, is it not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I understand, 100% of the brain being used at a time is called an epileptic seizure, is it not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1647/comment-page-1#comment-283470</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1647#comment-283470</guid>
		<description>This is what I like to tell friends.

&quot;Do you know what a ham sandwich smells like?&quot;
&quot;Yes.&quot;
&quot;Are you smelling a ham sandwich right now?&quot;
&quot;No.&quot;
&quot;That is part of the &#039;missing&#039; 90%&quot;

The brain has so much reduncancy built in that you wouldn&#039;t want to use &#039;100%&#039; of your brain power.  You would go insane from the sensory input alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I like to tell friends.</p>
<p>&#8220;Do you know what a ham sandwich smells like?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Yes.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Are you smelling a ham sandwich right now?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;No.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;That is part of the &#8216;missing&#8217; 90%&#8221;</p>
<p>The brain has so much reduncancy built in that you wouldn&#8217;t want to use &#8216;100%&#8217; of your brain power.  You would go insane from the sensory input alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GW Crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1647/comment-page-1#comment-261782</link>
		<dc:creator>GW Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1647#comment-261782</guid>
		<description>To say we only use 10% of our brain is kind of true

At a time, maybe

By that logic the most highly developed body is a full seizure victim, flailing about and thrashing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To say we only use 10% of our brain is kind of true</p>
<p>At a time, maybe</p>
<p>By that logic the most highly developed body is a full seizure victim, flailing about and thrashing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1647/comment-page-1#comment-79673</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 23:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1647#comment-79673</guid>
		<description>Humans use more or less all of our brain. But how much of our brain do we CONCIOUSLY use? There are numerous automatic processes we have no control over, such as vision. So I think &quot;90% of brain&quot; should be intepreted as &quot;control over 90% of brain&quot;, in a way humans don&#039;t have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humans use more or less all of our brain. But how much of our brain do we CONCIOUSLY use? There are numerous automatic processes we have no control over, such as vision. So I think &#8220;90% of brain&#8221; should be intepreted as &#8220;control over 90% of brain&#8221;, in a way humans don&#8217;t have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1647/comment-page-1#comment-78000</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 10:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1647#comment-78000</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always taken DeathStroke&#039;s brain &quot;power&quot; to mean that his enhancement is that he can use more *at the same time*, whereas ordinary people may use the same amount over time, but can only use a smaller amount at any given moment - in computer terms, he&#039;s got something like 128-bit pathways compared to ordinary human 8-bit pathways. Same amount of data can be shipped over it, but much faster. So he reacts to situations fast, switches attention fast, can make decisions fast. It&#039;s not superspeed, or superintelligence, but more like superawareness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always taken DeathStroke&#8217;s brain &#8220;power&#8221; to mean that his enhancement is that he can use more *at the same time*, whereas ordinary people may use the same amount over time, but can only use a smaller amount at any given moment &#8211; in computer terms, he&#8217;s got something like 128-bit pathways compared to ordinary human 8-bit pathways. Same amount of data can be shipped over it, but much faster. So he reacts to situations fast, switches attention fast, can make decisions fast. It&#8217;s not superspeed, or superintelligence, but more like superawareness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Mc</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1647/comment-page-1#comment-77401</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Mc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 17:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1647#comment-77401</guid>
		<description>I present a gag on the subject.  Sorta:
http://www.breakpointcity.com/archives/2003/03/08/superpowers/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I present a gag on the subject.  Sorta:<br />
<a href="http://www.breakpointcity.com/archives/2003/03/08/superpowers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.breakpointcity.com/archives/2003/03/08/superpowers/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heimdall</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1647/comment-page-1#comment-77319</link>
		<dc:creator>Heimdall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 11:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1647#comment-77319</guid>
		<description>Yeah, this thing gets to me, too.
I like to respond to the 10% claim by saying, &quot;So I guess you won&#039;t mind if I shoot you in the 90% of your brain that you&#039;re not using.&quot;
(Not sure where I first encountered that line, but it&#039;s a good one.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this thing gets to me, too.<br />
I like to respond to the 10% claim by saying, &#8220;So I guess you won&#8217;t mind if I shoot you in the 90% of your brain that you&#8217;re not using.&#8221;<br />
(Not sure where I first encountered that line, but it&#8217;s a good one.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragnell</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1647/comment-page-1#comment-77226</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 06:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1647#comment-77226</guid>
		<description>Thanks!  I run into that &amp;*%#! myth so often talking religion its unbelievably irritating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!  I run into that &amp;*%#! myth so often talking religion its unbelievably irritating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F. J.</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1647/comment-page-1#comment-77218</link>
		<dc:creator>F. J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 06:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1647#comment-77218</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the Teen Titans&#039; villain Deathstroke entirely based on the idea that humans can only use less than 10% of their brain, and that he&#039;s such a great assassin because he was scientifically enhanced to where he can use nearly all of his?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the Teen Titans&#8217; villain Deathstroke entirely based on the idea that humans can only use less than 10% of their brain, and that he&#8217;s such a great assassin because he was scientifically enhanced to where he can use nearly all of his?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

