Monday PSA: Batman — Seduction of the Gun
Filed under: Comics
In 1990, the adult son of one of the Warner Brothers executives who worked with DC Comics was senselessly murdered. In response, DC published Batman: Seduction of the Gun, a comic with a strong anti-gun tone, and with the added bonus of the proceeds going to a charitable educational foundation.
In Gotham City, a drug-for-guns deal is going down. The police and Batman bust up the deal, but the main criminals — members of the NZN gang — escape. To capture the gang, Batman masquerades as a gun dealer while Robin enrolls in an inner-city high to protect the dealer’s daughter from gang reprisal. The Batman aspect of the story is a fairly typical Batman adventure with subterfuge, fights, and narrow escapes from death. The Robin part I found a little over the top, with Robin attending a school where over 95% of the students are armed, and gun fights in the hallways between classes are daily experiences. Admittedly, I didn’t attend an inner city high school, but this strikes me as more than a little unbelievable. Both stories converge in the end, but things don’t work out as well as Batman — and Robin — had hoped.
Overall, it’s a well done story and a PSA comic that actually appears to be in continuity. For the most part, it doesn’t hit the reader over the head with its message, though there is a page or two of talking heads looking directly at the reader and lecturing. We also learn way too much about the wounds that killed Thomas and Martha Wayne (“The bullet…struck the left lung and then the heart through the right ventricle, ruptured the superior vena cava and the aorta. The bullets struck back left ribs and flattened out, breaking the ribs…I remember a lot of blood. The hearts continued pumping for a bit.”). The story by John Ostrander contains the intense action-filled plot with a touch of pathos he seems to favor (and it works for him, his scripts hit a lot more than they miss). The Vince Giarrano art is a satisfying cross between Graham Nolan and Neal Adams. There are places where the art is particularly explicit and disturbing — bullet wounds, for instance — but I suspect that was the intended effect.
Online, I’ve seen this comic described as “pro-gun-control”, but I don’t think that’s really the case. I can certainly see where people might get that impression, particularly as the proceeds from the book went to an educational gun-control foundation, but in the last panels of the comic, Bruce Wayne tells Tim Drake that gun control is not the best option (“No law passed can change the human heart or open up a mind that is closed. We must give up the guns in our hearts and minds first.”). The story certainly takes a strong stand against the proliferation of handguns, but gun control is not specifically mentioned. To me, the comic seems more anti-guns-in-school, anti-gang, and anti-Saturday-Night-special than explicitly anti-gun or pro-gun-control, though I may be splitting hairs.
June 19th, 2007 at 11:40 am
There’s been a great deal of anxiety and anti-violence initiative here in Toronto because
a teen, Jordan Manners, was shot in a school hallway a few weeks
ago. The good, news, such as it is, is that it’s still a rare enough thing to be shocking.
Most of the shootings here seem kind of random – when I’m feeling cynical, I say that if guns
can’t be kept off the streets, then criminals should be given firearm safety lessons
so at least they hit their rivals and not some guy watching tv in his living room down the
block, or a woman on the opposite site of the dance floor who was just out for an evening
with friends. :(
June 20th, 2007 at 9:42 am
I haven’t read this issue, but I recall a letter in another Batman issue regarding it. The letter-writer, IIRC, was somewhat sympathetic to the book’s agenda, but was terribly annoyed to reach the issue’s end and discover that his money had been donated to an interest group. Not being pleased that this was not disclosed upfront, he donated an equivalent amount to the NRA, to balance things out.
Out of curiosity, what was the foundation that the money was donated to?
June 21st, 2007 at 2:14 pm
I read that book in high school, and really, really enjoyed it. As you say, it was prety much a sstandard Batman comic…I enjoyed it the same way I would have a Batman annual.
Regarding the politics of it, it didn’t strike me as heavy-handed, although there was a lot of talk of statistics and politics (At the time it was published, other Batman writers, like Alan Grant, would do similar things in terms of couching an issue or subject in a Batman story having all the characters talk about it, whether it was something like the environment or just cats in general, if that makes sense).
And really, if there’s one superhero who can be excused for being asn anti-gun as possible, it’s Batman. I mean, if Batman did want to break into your house and steal your guns, could you blame him? The guy was so profoundly affected by a gun that it made him dress like a bat.
June 21st, 2007 at 8:32 pm
Official Comment
Loren,
The last page of the comic is a text page that states in part: “the proceeds from Batman: Seduction of the Gun are going to the John A. Reisenbach Foundation for gun-control education activities.”
July 13th, 2007 at 3:41 pm
I read this issue when it was first published, and upon finishing it, was, to put it lightly, extremely angry that DC was now pushing partisan political issues. I have to disagree with you…the message was very much anti-gun, period, and the writers and editors were upfront about it. I’m a political junkie myself, but I feel that these characters belong to everyone, and it’s a kind of crime to hijack them for your pet causes. Should Superman stump for tax cuts? Should Wonder Woman crusade for abortion rights? I don’t think so. Once the character starts picking sides becuase of a writer’s politics, you alienate part of the fanbase.
July 24th, 2007 at 5:06 pm
It is indeed anti-gun in concept, which is why Chuck Dixon passed on the writing assignment.
He refused to do a political tract. even to feed his kids.
January 11th, 2008 at 7:01 am
I realize I’m very late in commenting, but I just found this website. I read this book and I remember really liking the cover art because it looked like a painting rather than a sketch on cheap paper. I did feel that the ant-gun thing was really being pushed; however, I felt it was sort of being put in Batman’s mindset. That version of Batman hated guns. In the original Batman comics of the 1940’s, Batman actually used guns and killed people.
It is a bit funny for me to see people complaining about superheroes in comics being used to push political agenda because, in a way, that is what their original purpose was. Captain America fought the Nazis. There were actually advertisements with Superman saying “You can slap a Jap– with War Bonds” (which is not only political but very racist). Comics were used to push anti-smoking, anti-AIDS hating, anti-gay bashing, anti-drugs, and anti-guns. At other points they were pro-killing criminals. But times have changed and I admit it is annoying when comics are overtly pushing a political agenda. Peter David was very anti-gun and angered a few fans of Young Justice. I found Devin Grayson’s pro-gay inclusions to be way too forced in Nightwing. I’m going to stop there because Devin Grayson is one of the reasons I completely stopped reading comics.
November 5th, 2008 at 10:02 am
Everybody seems to be missing the point, that the comic was designed to bring awareness regarding the senseless death of a human being. A young life was murdered by the use of a gun. Who cares where the proceeds went. The comic had to be graphic to make it’s point. Instead of whining about semantics why not have a little sympathy for the family of this victim and learn the lesson, that there is absolutely only one use for a handgun, to kill a human being.
January 12th, 2012 at 1:30 pm
[...] remember this Batman comic, which I owned and adored during the same time as I coveted said Starter parka. It depicts [...]
Leave a Reply
Contact Me
About
Subscribe:
The Best Of...
Special Topics
Archives
Categories
Twitter
See Also
Comic Blogs
Medical/Science Blogs
Currently Reading
Arbitrarily Interesting Medical Condition
Syndrome
The Net:
Contents may have settled during shipping. Past results are no guarantee of future performance. No animals were harmed during the production of this product. Void where prohibited by law. All rights reserved. Not valid with other offers or specials. Professional driver on a closed track. Your financial institution may impose other fees. All models are over 18 years of age. Employees must wash hands before returning to work. Results not typical. Many suitcases look alike. 18% gratuity added to tables of six or more.
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
© 2004-2012 Polite Dissent. Powered by WordPress