<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House &#8211; Episode 6 (Season 4): &#8220;Whatever It Takes&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1800/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1800</link>
	<description>a blog of medicine, comics, television, science and other fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:50:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ecoli</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1800/comment-page-2#comment-1119753</link>
		<dc:creator>ecoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1800#comment-1119753</guid>
		<description>@Ding,
as far as I understand, not all gamma-rays are relevant, and Sr90 doesn&#039;t have enough of them to matter and I am not sure about Po210 either. Besides, radiation poisoning can be triggered by a short-term exposure to radiation (e.g a faulty Cs137 generator) which would not show up later on, especially if you mind that gamma-rayers make poor weapons (too long range and to weak effects). It&#039;s a common fantasy that ALL radiation will turn stuff radioactive, BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ding,<br />
as far as I understand, not all gamma-rays are relevant, and Sr90 doesn&#8217;t have enough of them to matter and I am not sure about Po210 either. Besides, radiation poisoning can be triggered by a short-term exposure to radiation (e.g a faulty Cs137 generator) which would not show up later on, especially if you mind that gamma-rayers make poor weapons (too long range and to weak effects). It&#8217;s a common fantasy that ALL radiation will turn stuff radioactive, BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kkkkkkllll</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1800/comment-page-2#comment-1033308</link>
		<dc:creator>kkkkkkllll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1800#comment-1033308</guid>
		<description>@Sean

I actually think she said &quot;every heavy metal and toxin we could think of....&quot;

guess selenium slipped their mind....
 
not to mention selenium isn&#039;t a metal xp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sean</p>
<p>I actually think she said &#8220;every heavy metal and toxin we could think of&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>guess selenium slipped their mind&#8230;.</p>
<p>not to mention selenium isn&#8217;t a metal xp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Houseequalsgoodshow</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1800/comment-page-2#comment-1016209</link>
		<dc:creator>Houseequalsgoodshow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1800#comment-1016209</guid>
		<description>Me &quot;I fail to see clearly why Brennan was fired.&quot;

House cares about getting the right answer, or solving the puzzle, as he would say.

The team as a whole cares about getting the right answer and saving the patient.

Brennan deliberately poisoned the patient for no justifiable medical reason  (a clear violation of ethics and the law) which only misled the team from a correct diagnosis and put the patient&#039;s safety at risk.  House on the other hand, takes risks when it will lead him to a better diagnosis.

Having Brennan around only hurts the team.  Not to mention he&#039;s a complete psycho, as House said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me &#8220;I fail to see clearly why Brennan was fired.&#8221;</p>
<p>House cares about getting the right answer, or solving the puzzle, as he would say.</p>
<p>The team as a whole cares about getting the right answer and saving the patient.</p>
<p>Brennan deliberately poisoned the patient for no justifiable medical reason  (a clear violation of ethics and the law) which only misled the team from a correct diagnosis and put the patient&#8217;s safety at risk.  House on the other hand, takes risks when it will lead him to a better diagnosis.</p>
<p>Having Brennan around only hurts the team.  Not to mention he&#8217;s a complete psycho, as House said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1800/comment-page-2#comment-1014208</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 04:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1800#comment-1014208</guid>
		<description>Why does that female doctor say she tested for &quot;all known heavy metals&quot; and the final diagnosis was SELENIUM? What was that about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does that female doctor say she tested for &#8220;all known heavy metals&#8221; and the final diagnosis was SELENIUM? What was that about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trlkly</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1800/comment-page-2#comment-823642</link>
		<dc:creator>trlkly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 03:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1800#comment-823642</guid>
		<description>@Me: He was giving a him a medication intentionally to create symptoms, and falsified the results of a test. Not to save the patient, but for some pet political cause (that isn&#039;t even correct, as indicated above.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Me: He was giving a him a medication intentionally to create symptoms, and falsified the results of a test. Not to save the patient, but for some pet political cause (that isn&#8217;t even correct, as indicated above.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1800/comment-page-2#comment-503551</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1800#comment-503551</guid>
		<description>I fail to see clearly why Brennan was fired.

yes he was unethical in poisoning a patient to prove a point but....

isn&#039;t that what House does in a regular basis? Treats patients without the certainty of what they really have, causes them fever and strokes just to prove a diagnosis till he is wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see clearly why Brennan was fired.</p>
<p>yes he was unethical in poisoning a patient to prove a point but&#8230;.</p>
<p>isn&#8217;t that what House does in a regular basis? Treats patients without the certainty of what they really have, causes them fever and strokes just to prove a diagnosis till he is wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrazilianChick</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1800/comment-page-2#comment-481478</link>
		<dc:creator>BrazilianChick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1800#comment-481478</guid>
		<description>oh yeah, and that &quot;Devil dance&quot; sounded a little off to me, too. =/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yeah, and that &#8220;Devil dance&#8221; sounded a little off to me, too. =/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrazilianChick</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1800/comment-page-2#comment-477113</link>
		<dc:creator>BrazilianChick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1800#comment-477113</guid>
		<description>*3-5 days OFF school
typo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*3-5 days OFF school<br />
typo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrazilianChick</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1800/comment-page-2#comment-477112</link>
		<dc:creator>BrazilianChick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1800#comment-477112</guid>
		<description>I looooved that the show metioned my country(and that hugh&#039;s &quot;Castanha do Pará&quot; line was so hot!), but c&#039;mon?! 
40 days of carnaval?! 
I wish!
Then I would get more that 3-5 days of school!  ¬¬</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looooved that the show metioned my country(and that hugh&#8217;s &#8220;Castanha do Pará&#8221; line was so hot!), but c&#8217;mon?!<br />
40 days of carnaval?!<br />
I wish!<br />
Then I would get more that 3-5 days of school!  ¬¬</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1800/comment-page-2#comment-398985</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1800#comment-398985</guid>
		<description>... pretty sure val&#039;ay is correct. I&#039;ve heard some bizarre manglings of words in my time, but I&#039;ve never heard anyone say val&#039;ett.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; pretty sure val&#8217;ay is correct. I&#8217;ve heard some bizarre manglings of words in my time, but I&#8217;ve never heard anyone say val&#8217;ett.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

