<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House &#8211; Episode 9 (Season 4): &#8220;Games&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1821/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1821</link>
	<description>a blog of medicine, comics, television, science and other fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:16:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1821/comment-page-3#comment-453129</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1821#comment-453129</guid>
		<description>Just found this post, and don&#039;t have time to read through all the comments, but:

Re: seizures-- from my research as someone in the process of being diagnosed with epilepsy, it seems that complex can mean that you lose awareness.  Not REALIZING you&#039;re swallowing and tuning the world out for a minute might be considered complex... or if not I can understand why the writers would think it might be.  Also, I have simple partial seizures (mainly in response to noise and loud music, ironically enough) and have been warned that if my seizure threshold is assaulted efficiently and often enough there is a chance my seizures might escalate into TC&#039;s.

Obviously this might or might not be true for a case of the measles, but it seemed worth mentioning.  And of course, I&#039;m sure not a doctor, just a nursing student undergoing a lot of EEG&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just found this post, and don&#8217;t have time to read through all the comments, but:</p>
<p>Re: seizures&#8211; from my research as someone in the process of being diagnosed with epilepsy, it seems that complex can mean that you lose awareness.  Not REALIZING you&#8217;re swallowing and tuning the world out for a minute might be considered complex&#8230; or if not I can understand why the writers would think it might be.  Also, I have simple partial seizures (mainly in response to noise and loud music, ironically enough) and have been warned that if my seizure threshold is assaulted efficiently and often enough there is a chance my seizures might escalate into TC&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Obviously this might or might not be true for a case of the measles, but it seemed worth mentioning.  And of course, I&#8217;m sure not a doctor, just a nursing student undergoing a lot of EEG&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1821/comment-page-3#comment-427377</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1821#comment-427377</guid>
		<description>Just my thoughts, but is the immune system really ravished by the drugs, or is it more like the deterioration of hygiene, sleep, nutrition etc. and its effects seen in some stratas of society who may or not use drugs, don&#039;t get me started on my stoner neighbour playing Wo&#039;W all night while lending me his WhiteCastle DVD. For example some of the damages seen in Meth users are AFAIK due to an interaction of drugs actions, e.g. nicotine is more enjoyable, teeth are tending to grind, there is something sympathicomimetic going on with your saliva, you start executing stereotypies with the termites under your skin, and social factors, like diet etc.
Effects not seen in other use, I like to think my 5 mg of MPh help to keep the refrigerator stuffed with something at least partially healthy and me away from the next Doener Kebap. ;)
Sorry to ask, but mention of putative immunosuppressive effects of certain substances get my Duesberg (and Mullis) reflexes going, and I&#039;m not talking aneuploidy of cancer cells here... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just my thoughts, but is the immune system really ravished by the drugs, or is it more like the deterioration of hygiene, sleep, nutrition etc. and its effects seen in some stratas of society who may or not use drugs, don&#8217;t get me started on my stoner neighbour playing Wo&#8217;W all night while lending me his WhiteCastle DVD. For example some of the damages seen in Meth users are AFAIK due to an interaction of drugs actions, e.g. nicotine is more enjoyable, teeth are tending to grind, there is something sympathicomimetic going on with your saliva, you start executing stereotypies with the termites under your skin, and social factors, like diet etc.<br />
Effects not seen in other use, I like to think my 5 mg of MPh help to keep the refrigerator stuffed with something at least partially healthy and me away from the next Doener Kebap. ;)<br />
Sorry to ask, but mention of putative immunosuppressive effects of certain substances get my Duesberg (and Mullis) reflexes going, and I&#8217;m not talking aneuploidy of cancer cells here&#8230; ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sulpher Dragon</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1821/comment-page-3#comment-313626</link>
		<dc:creator>Sulpher Dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 14:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1821#comment-313626</guid>
		<description>Easily the worst house episode ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easily the worst house episode ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1821/comment-page-3#comment-275296</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1821#comment-275296</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a European so we automatically start off by liking the &#039;nasty&#039; character - I&#039;m sorry to see CTB go. She might not have had much depth - none of them do - but she had panache. 13 is just &#039;troubled&#039; or, rather, has been given a fatal disease which is short-hand for &#039;troubled&#039;. She&#039;s going to develop into a first rate sob story with attendant pain-in-the-neckitis, mark my words.

Has anyone noticed a general deterioration in the depth of characterisation in this series? House&#039;s eccentricities and quiddities somehow are now just dramatic tics, with no real motive, rather than being symptoms of his physical agony and his addiction. Cutty is no nothing more than a giggling, flirtatious dorm mother while Foreman doesn&#039;t do much but alternately smoulder and sigh at House&#039;s &#039;outrageousness&#039;. The only character who seems to have maintained any nuance is Wilson and that&#039;s only because Robert Sean Leonard&#039;s acting is so disingenuously naturalistic that he will undoubtely be fired for being &#039;boring&#039; and replaced with, hmmm, that brimming-eyed nonce, Ethan Hawke.

I must admit, while I did like the reality show-elimination motif of the first nine episodes of Season 4 it suggested that alongside the purging of Foreman, Chase and Cameron, and the change in the show&#039;s tenor, somewhere behind the scenes a major change has taken place and now someone new is calling the shots in the production staff. I wonder who it is and how they got the network to approve this radical retooling of the programmes structure and style?

On a general note, may I also add my voice to those applauding the variety, tone and breadth of your site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a European so we automatically start off by liking the &#8216;nasty&#8217; character &#8211; I&#8217;m sorry to see CTB go. She might not have had much depth &#8211; none of them do &#8211; but she had panache. 13 is just &#8216;troubled&#8217; or, rather, has been given a fatal disease which is short-hand for &#8216;troubled&#8217;. She&#8217;s going to develop into a first rate sob story with attendant pain-in-the-neckitis, mark my words.</p>
<p>Has anyone noticed a general deterioration in the depth of characterisation in this series? House&#8217;s eccentricities and quiddities somehow are now just dramatic tics, with no real motive, rather than being symptoms of his physical agony and his addiction. Cutty is no nothing more than a giggling, flirtatious dorm mother while Foreman doesn&#8217;t do much but alternately smoulder and sigh at House&#8217;s &#8216;outrageousness&#8217;. The only character who seems to have maintained any nuance is Wilson and that&#8217;s only because Robert Sean Leonard&#8217;s acting is so disingenuously naturalistic that he will undoubtely be fired for being &#8216;boring&#8217; and replaced with, hmmm, that brimming-eyed nonce, Ethan Hawke.</p>
<p>I must admit, while I did like the reality show-elimination motif of the first nine episodes of Season 4 it suggested that alongside the purging of Foreman, Chase and Cameron, and the change in the show&#8217;s tenor, somewhere behind the scenes a major change has taken place and now someone new is calling the shots in the production staff. I wonder who it is and how they got the network to approve this radical retooling of the programmes structure and style?</p>
<p>On a general note, may I also add my voice to those applauding the variety, tone and breadth of your site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polybus</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1821/comment-page-3#comment-274573</link>
		<dc:creator>Polybus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1821#comment-274573</guid>
		<description>Whilst I agree that the music at the end of the episode is indeed &#039;Spirit In The Sky&#039;, I am less certain that it is the version recorded by Norman Greenbaum in 1969.  

Instead, I wonder if it might be the 1988 cover version by the British &#039;one hit wonder&#039; group, Doctor and The Medics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst I agree that the music at the end of the episode is indeed &#8216;Spirit In The Sky&#8217;, I am less certain that it is the version recorded by Norman Greenbaum in 1969.  </p>
<p>Instead, I wonder if it might be the 1988 cover version by the British &#8216;one hit wonder&#8217; group, Doctor and The Medics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1821/comment-page-3#comment-262978</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 04:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1821#comment-262978</guid>
		<description>The song played at the end of the episode is Spirit In The Sky by Norman Greenbaum, its a cool music from the 70s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The song played at the end of the episode is Spirit In The Sky by Norman Greenbaum, its a cool music from the 70s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1821/comment-page-3#comment-251566</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1821#comment-251566</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;ve watched enough television in my time to qualify as a Master viewer, if not an outright Expert.  I&#039;m confident I can tell good television and soap opera from the bad stuff.  Plus on shows like &lt;b&gt;House&lt;/b&gt;, the non-medical aspects become intertwined with the medical aspects, and you can&#039;t comment on one without at least acknowledging the other.

And for Heaven&#039;s sake, if you don&#039;t like what you&#039;re reading, then don&#039;t read it.  Nobody is forcing you to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ve watched enough television in my time to qualify as a Master viewer, if not an outright Expert.  I&#8217;m confident I can tell good television and soap opera from the bad stuff.  Plus on shows like <b>House</b>, the non-medical aspects become intertwined with the medical aspects, and you can&#8217;t comment on one without at least acknowledging the other.</p>
<p>And for Heaven&#8217;s sake, if you don&#8217;t like what you&#8217;re reading, then don&#8217;t read it.  Nobody is forcing you to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semih Alkan</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1821/comment-page-3#comment-251525</link>
		<dc:creator>Semih Alkan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 05:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1821#comment-251525</guid>
		<description>As far as I am concerned, this site is advertised as contaning a critical point of view about the medicine in House episodes.I really appreciate the medical criticism, but what about the grades about the story, soap opera etc ? Again, as far as I am concerned, the critic is an expert about the medicine (as being a physician), but not the other staff.But he/she composes his both medicial and other view in one article, making the audience to think that he is also a critic about the story, soap opera etc.

Maybe audience likes it but still, I don&#039;t think it is right</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I am concerned, this site is advertised as contaning a critical point of view about the medicine in House episodes.I really appreciate the medical criticism, but what about the grades about the story, soap opera etc ? Again, as far as I am concerned, the critic is an expert about the medicine (as being a physician), but not the other staff.But he/she composes his both medicial and other view in one article, making the audience to think that he is also a critic about the story, soap opera etc.</p>
<p>Maybe audience likes it but still, I don&#8217;t think it is right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grace</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1821/comment-page-3#comment-246367</link>
		<dc:creator>Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1821#comment-246367</guid>
		<description>Everything in this post is my humble opinion.

I watched &quot;Games&quot; this week.  What a sorry episode.

I recently watched episode 1.12 which contained pretty much everything I like about _House_.  House with his brilliant, sharp-edged wit, sarcastic and cynical; coping with pain, and ending up having fun with Cameron at monster truck rally!  The scene in which House learns Wilson is going out for dinner with Stacy, renders House as near to jealous speechlessness as House can get.  He&#039;s ungracious even while he acknowledges that Wilson and Stacy are friends.  The ambiguities of the scene are as good as the scene itself:  Is House more jealous of Stacy or of Wilson?  How much of this issue is heartache?  Or heart break?  House seems shaken:  by the lack of knowledge?  Or by the confrontation with the truth:  House actually has much less control than he thinks, or wants to think.

Almost every scene is like that.  That&#039;s compelling television.  Here in Hawaii, _House_ is on at the same time as _Nova_.  I started out taping _House_ and watching _Nova_.  But _House_ was so compelling, I started taping _Nova_ instead.  For the next three episodes, I plan to watch _Nova_ and tape _House_.

&quot;Games&quot; was predictable.  I liked the Wilson scenes as always.  The scene at the end in which Cuddy realizes House has been playing was flat:  it was not set up right, and Cuddy behaved out of character.  And House &quot;promises&quot; (or is threatens?) more to come!  

I have hope, though.  I believe the Big Wigs at Fox know they&#039;re losing their audience.  If the ratings for this season of _House_ were good, Fox would have shown all nine season four episodes as a countdown to the three new episodes.  Instead, they&#039;ve run episodes from the seasons one through three.  Fox does not want to lose their market share:  they&#039;ll attempt to do better in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything in this post is my humble opinion.</p>
<p>I watched &#8220;Games&#8221; this week.  What a sorry episode.</p>
<p>I recently watched episode 1.12 which contained pretty much everything I like about _House_.  House with his brilliant, sharp-edged wit, sarcastic and cynical; coping with pain, and ending up having fun with Cameron at monster truck rally!  The scene in which House learns Wilson is going out for dinner with Stacy, renders House as near to jealous speechlessness as House can get.  He&#8217;s ungracious even while he acknowledges that Wilson and Stacy are friends.  The ambiguities of the scene are as good as the scene itself:  Is House more jealous of Stacy or of Wilson?  How much of this issue is heartache?  Or heart break?  House seems shaken:  by the lack of knowledge?  Or by the confrontation with the truth:  House actually has much less control than he thinks, or wants to think.</p>
<p>Almost every scene is like that.  That&#8217;s compelling television.  Here in Hawaii, _House_ is on at the same time as _Nova_.  I started out taping _House_ and watching _Nova_.  But _House_ was so compelling, I started taping _Nova_ instead.  For the next three episodes, I plan to watch _Nova_ and tape _House_.</p>
<p>&#8220;Games&#8221; was predictable.  I liked the Wilson scenes as always.  The scene at the end in which Cuddy realizes House has been playing was flat:  it was not set up right, and Cuddy behaved out of character.  And House &#8220;promises&#8221; (or is threatens?) more to come!  </p>
<p>I have hope, though.  I believe the Big Wigs at Fox know they&#8217;re losing their audience.  If the ratings for this season of _House_ were good, Fox would have shown all nine season four episodes as a countdown to the three new episodes.  Instead, they&#8217;ve run episodes from the seasons one through three.  Fox does not want to lose their market share:  they&#8217;ll attempt to do better in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1821/comment-page-3#comment-239927</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/1821#comment-239927</guid>
		<description>I know this is about two months too late, but I just had to pipe in and say: Robert Sean Leonard is one of the best actors on the show. Period. He&#039;s brilliant and even has a damn Tony. Whoever suggested Wilson played the scene incorrectly is responsible for giving me a heartache out of shock. How&#039;s that for bad medicine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is about two months too late, but I just had to pipe in and say: Robert Sean Leonard is one of the best actors on the show. Period. He&#8217;s brilliant and even has a damn Tony. Whoever suggested Wilson played the scene incorrectly is responsible for giving me a heartache out of shock. How&#8217;s that for bad medicine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
