<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fringe &#8211; Episode 8: &#8220;The Equation&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2129/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2129</link>
	<description>a blog of medicine, comics, television, science and other fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:50:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2129/comment-page-1#comment-527079</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 22:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2129#comment-527079</guid>
		<description>Peter actually played for ten bars. The piece didn&#039;t repeat. 

A quick flash of the music showed that it was in 3/4 time. He played for 9 bars, and the last bar was a single dotted minim. It wouldn&#039;t have made sense to play for only 9 bars, as it wouldn&#039;t have fitted the musical phrase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter actually played for ten bars. The piece didn&#8217;t repeat. </p>
<p>A quick flash of the music showed that it was in 3/4 time. He played for 9 bars, and the last bar was a single dotted minim. It wouldn&#8217;t have made sense to play for only 9 bars, as it wouldn&#8217;t have fitted the musical phrase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2129/comment-page-1#comment-441162</link>
		<dc:creator>mike.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2129#comment-441162</guid>
		<description>I actually thought this episode was a step backwards from the heart-parasite one, if only because it fell back into the whole this-reminds-me-of-a-very-specific-thing-that-once-happened-to-me-30-years-ago plot device that this show really needs to get away from.

But you gotta admit that Randall Duk Kim is da man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually thought this episode was a step backwards from the heart-parasite one, if only because it fell back into the whole this-reminds-me-of-a-very-specific-thing-that-once-happened-to-me-30-years-ago plot device that this show really needs to get away from.</p>
<p>But you gotta admit that Randall Duk Kim is da man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2129/comment-page-1#comment-439182</link>
		<dc:creator>Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2129#comment-439182</guid>
		<description>@evaxebra Yeah, you&#039;re spot on. I&#039;m not quite a mathematician (computer scientist with heavy theory background), but the math just made me wince. I think vague statements of &#039;math and music are the same&#039; is becoming one of my pet peaves. Yes, there are many similarities, I&#039;m particularly fond of the structural similarities between proofs and music. No, this does not mean there&#039;s a 1-to-1 correlation between music and math, or even a many-to-1 mapping. It was definitely one of the better episodes so far, but the idea of converting a proof to music (or vice versa) in some kind of definite deterministic way is more then a little crazy. Sure, there&#039;s some arbitrary mapping (or more then one), but not some absolute connection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@evaxebra Yeah, you&#8217;re spot on. I&#8217;m not quite a mathematician (computer scientist with heavy theory background), but the math just made me wince. I think vague statements of &#8216;math and music are the same&#8217; is becoming one of my pet peaves. Yes, there are many similarities, I&#8217;m particularly fond of the structural similarities between proofs and music. No, this does not mean there&#8217;s a 1-to-1 correlation between music and math, or even a many-to-1 mapping. It was definitely one of the better episodes so far, but the idea of converting a proof to music (or vice versa) in some kind of definite deterministic way is more then a little crazy. Sure, there&#8217;s some arbitrary mapping (or more then one), but not some absolute connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evaxebra</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2129/comment-page-1#comment-438892</link>
		<dc:creator>evaxebra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2129#comment-438892</guid>
		<description>Thanks for these great reviews! I always read your intro before I watch the episode so I was excited to see a good one. My husband, the mathematician, then deduced &quot;he probably liked it because there&#039;s no medicine to screw up, but I bet there will be a ton of math they&#039;re going to mess with.&quot;
And he was right. He complained the entire last half of the episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for these great reviews! I always read your intro before I watch the episode so I was excited to see a good one. My husband, the mathematician, then deduced &#8220;he probably liked it because there&#8217;s no medicine to screw up, but I bet there will be a ton of math they&#8217;re going to mess with.&#8221;<br />
And he was right. He complained the entire last half of the episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpotWeld</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2129/comment-page-1#comment-438849</link>
		<dc:creator>SpotWeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2129#comment-438849</guid>
		<description>When I saw the episode was starting out in Middletown, CT; I initially though it would have something to do with the local Connecticut General Hospital for the Insane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw the episode was starting out in Middletown, CT; I initially though it would have something to do with the local Connecticut General Hospital for the Insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2129/comment-page-1#comment-438836</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2129#comment-438836</guid>
		<description>lol, my bad, I can&#039;t navigate this site at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, my bad, I can&#8217;t navigate this site at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Duggan</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2129/comment-page-1#comment-438826</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Duggan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2129#comment-438826</guid>
		<description>@Brian
Actually &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://politedissent.com/archives/2096&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;he did&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian<br />
Actually <a HREF="http://politedissent.com/archives/2096" rel="nofollow">he did</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2129/comment-page-1#comment-438811</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2129#comment-438811</guid>
		<description>You should review Eleventh Hour. It&#039;s kind of a cross between Fringe and House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should review Eleventh Hour. It&#8217;s kind of a cross between Fringe and House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2129/comment-page-1#comment-438804</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2129#comment-438804</guid>
		<description>&lt;font color=&quot;green&quot;&gt;I asked one of my partners, a physician and retired Air Force colonel , and he states that people with red/green color blindness CAN be in the military, they just can&#039;t be in a rated position (i.e. pilot, air traffic controller).&lt;/font&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font color="green">I asked one of my partners, a physician and retired Air Force colonel , and he states that people with red/green color blindness CAN be in the military, they just can&#8217;t be in a rated position (i.e. pilot, air traffic controller).</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Duggan</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2129/comment-page-1#comment-438791</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Duggan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2129#comment-438791</guid>
		<description>@MrBuddWing - I don&#039;t really know about federal agents, but I know that during the Great Wars, they hired entirely color-blind people as spotters because they were better at pattern-matching and therefore could pick out the camouflaged tanks. And I know that some police forces have no problems with color-blindness because a friend of mine from KY has a father who&#039;s entirely color-blind (his wife actually has to bundle his outfits in the closet to be sure he doesn&#039;t wear clashing colors) and he&#039;s on the local SWAT team for the county police force.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MrBuddWing &#8211; I don&#8217;t really know about federal agents, but I know that during the Great Wars, they hired entirely color-blind people as spotters because they were better at pattern-matching and therefore could pick out the camouflaged tanks. And I know that some police forces have no problems with color-blindness because a friend of mine from KY has a father who&#8217;s entirely color-blind (his wife actually has to bundle his outfits in the closet to be sure he doesn&#8217;t wear clashing colors) and he&#8217;s on the local SWAT team for the county police force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

