<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Picture Quiz: The Authority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2183/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2183</link>
	<description>a blog of medicine, comics, television, science and other fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:07:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2183/comment-page-1#comment-454441</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2183#comment-454441</guid>
		<description>&lt;font color=&quot;green&quot;&gt;The way it, there are either one or two medical errors:

ONE - If the Engineer simply slipped up and said &quot;sacrum&quot; instead of &quot;lumbar spine&quot; then that&#039;s a single simple error.

TWO - However, if the Engineer truly meant &quot;Sacrum&quot; then there are two errors:  First, the x-ray shows the lumbar spine; second, a sacral spine fracture does not cause paraplegia.

Otherwise, I figure his weird anatomy is due to the alien operations he has had.  That&#039;s a good catch on the mismatched perspective.  He should have better spinal support.  I think it&#039;s an old x-ray, not a real-time one.&lt;/font&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font color="green">The way it, there are either one or two medical errors:</p>
<p>ONE &#8211; If the Engineer simply slipped up and said &#8220;sacrum&#8221; instead of &#8220;lumbar spine&#8221; then that&#8217;s a single simple error.</p>
<p>TWO &#8211; However, if the Engineer truly meant &#8220;Sacrum&#8221; then there are two errors:  First, the x-ray shows the lumbar spine; second, a sacral spine fracture does not cause paraplegia.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I figure his weird anatomy is due to the alien operations he has had.  That&#8217;s a good catch on the mismatched perspective.  He should have better spinal support.  I think it&#8217;s an old x-ray, not a real-time one.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sable Hope</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2183/comment-page-1#comment-454357</link>
		<dc:creator>Sable Hope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2183#comment-454357</guid>
		<description>Skelly posture on the screen doesnt match his body in the bed- the arm is bent over his chest, his head is on pillows at an angle. Are we sure those doctor guys didnt just stick a phony scan up there to mess with the guy? [or a rubber toy skeleton, or something? Maybe one of those ones where they get half a monkey &amp; sew it to a fish...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skelly posture on the screen doesnt match his body in the bed- the arm is bent over his chest, his head is on pillows at an angle. Are we sure those doctor guys didnt just stick a phony scan up there to mess with the guy? [or a rubber toy skeleton, or something? Maybe one of those ones where they get half a monkey &amp; sew it to a fish...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2183/comment-page-1#comment-454318</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2183#comment-454318</guid>
		<description>The sacrum is located between the hip bones, and they;re not really looking at it.  And, as others have said- Shouldn&#039;t jack be immobilised?  Is that much spinal damage even survivable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sacrum is located between the hip bones, and they;re not really looking at it.  And, as others have said- Shouldn&#8217;t jack be immobilised?  Is that much spinal damage even survivable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. B</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2183/comment-page-1#comment-454316</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2183#comment-454316</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t quite place the sternum or xiphoid.  Don&#039;t see the floating ribs.   

That guy is tough, his spine is beyond shattered.  It looks like somebody put a M80 on his spine, and lit the fuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t quite place the sternum or xiphoid.  Don&#8217;t see the floating ribs.   </p>
<p>That guy is tough, his spine is beyond shattered.  It looks like somebody put a M80 on his spine, and lit the fuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2183/comment-page-1#comment-454241</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2183#comment-454241</guid>
		<description>The ribs actually seem close to the right amount (24)... the spine is clearly anterior, or perhaps the skull is turned around, so either his clavicle is oddly large or his scapulae are oddly odd... all 5 lumbar vertebrae are not destroyed as any bone above that pelvic region would be a lumbar vertebrae and any vertebrae below where the ribs attach would be a lumbar one... other than that he seems alright</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ribs actually seem close to the right amount (24)&#8230; the spine is clearly anterior, or perhaps the skull is turned around, so either his clavicle is oddly large or his scapulae are oddly odd&#8230; all 5 lumbar vertebrae are not destroyed as any bone above that pelvic region would be a lumbar vertebrae and any vertebrae below where the ribs attach would be a lumbar one&#8230; other than that he seems alright</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Archeville</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2183/comment-page-1#comment-454225</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Archeville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2183#comment-454225</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t there be some faint traces of the sutures of the skull?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t there be some faint traces of the sutures of the skull?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fluffy</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2183/comment-page-1#comment-454209</link>
		<dc:creator>fluffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2183#comment-454209</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t seem particularly sanitary to have a hospital where the doctors are going around naked or wearing cowls or whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t seem particularly sanitary to have a hospital where the doctors are going around naked or wearing cowls or whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TayJK</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2183/comment-page-1#comment-454207</link>
		<dc:creator>TayJK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2183#comment-454207</guid>
		<description>He has, I&#039;m guessing, 40 ribs.  Most people don&#039;t have that many.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He has, I&#8217;m guessing, 40 ribs.  Most people don&#8217;t have that many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff R</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2183/comment-page-1#comment-454205</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2183#comment-454205</guid>
		<description>The screen is drawn in perspective, but the skeleton isn&#039;t, meaning that his bones must actually be compressed or elongated at one end...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The screen is drawn in perspective, but the skeleton isn&#8217;t, meaning that his bones must actually be compressed or elongated at one end&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/2183/comment-page-1#comment-454179</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/?p=2183#comment-454179</guid>
		<description>What is going on with his pelvis and ribs?  There seems to be excessive bone fusion going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is going on with his pelvis and ribs?  There seems to be excessive bone fusion going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
