<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House &#8212; Episode 2 (Season 6): &#8220;Epic Fail&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3650/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3650</link>
	<description>a blog of medicine, comics, television, science and other fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:42:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3650/comment-page-3#comment-684281</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3650#comment-684281</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have insight on the new filming technique being used? Epic Fail had a totally different look, not only from previous seasons, but from this season&#039;s first double episode.

And would some of those scenes show up in 3-D? They had the look (and, crap, I have glasses!) but I didn&#039;t test it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have insight on the new filming technique being used? Epic Fail had a totally different look, not only from previous seasons, but from this season&#8217;s first double episode.</p>
<p>And would some of those scenes show up in 3-D? They had the look (and, crap, I have glasses!) but I didn&#8217;t test it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biochemist</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3650/comment-page-3#comment-680763</link>
		<dc:creator>biochemist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3650#comment-680763</guid>
		<description>A question for the MDs out there.  Patient&#039;s neck swelling is finally explained as a reaction to iodine in the MRI contrast agent.  I know that iodine is used as an xray (CT) contrast agent, but is it also used in MRI, which is based on a very different principle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question for the MDs out there.  Patient&#8217;s neck swelling is finally explained as a reaction to iodine in the MRI contrast agent.  I know that iodine is used as an xray (CT) contrast agent, but is it also used in MRI, which is based on a very different principle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KenP, Game Developer</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3650/comment-page-3#comment-651468</link>
		<dc:creator>KenP, Game Developer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3650#comment-651468</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad very little time was spent on the game because the small amount that was annoyed me.  It gave me a very tiny taste of what doctors go through watching the show as a rule.

While Lee &amp; Roy may have been a reference to Leeroy Jenkins, the term the developer used was &quot;janky&quot;:
Poorly constructed or of poor quality

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Janky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad very little time was spent on the game because the small amount that was annoyed me.  It gave me a very tiny taste of what doctors go through watching the show as a rule.</p>
<p>While Lee &amp; Roy may have been a reference to Leeroy Jenkins, the term the developer used was &#8220;janky&#8221;:<br />
Poorly constructed or of poor quality</p>
<p><a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Janky" rel="nofollow">http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Janky</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan von Fiedler</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3650/comment-page-3#comment-648990</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan von Fiedler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3650#comment-648990</guid>
		<description>As a game designer, I have to say that the trouble they went through to make Vince&#039;s &quot;game&quot; really pissed me off. This has to be the most work someone has put into making a fake game, yet at the end of the day it still looks nothing like a real video game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a game designer, I have to say that the trouble they went through to make Vince&#8217;s &#8220;game&#8221; really pissed me off. This has to be the most work someone has put into making a fake game, yet at the end of the day it still looks nothing like a real video game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3650/comment-page-3#comment-645241</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3650#comment-645241</guid>
		<description>&quot;His mother would have had to have had Fabry&#039;s&quot;
Not necessarily. The gene for Fabry&#039;s is recessive, so his mother could carry it on one X-chromosome but not the other, and thus not develop the disease. However, it is true that a woman with Fabry&#039;s Disease would definitely pass it on to any sons she had, and all her daughters would be carriers, as she would have to have the double-recessive form to develop the disease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;His mother would have had to have had Fabry&#8217;s&#8221;<br />
Not necessarily. The gene for Fabry&#8217;s is recessive, so his mother could carry it on one X-chromosome but not the other, and thus not develop the disease. However, it is true that a woman with Fabry&#8217;s Disease would definitely pass it on to any sons she had, and all her daughters would be carriers, as she would have to have the double-recessive form to develop the disease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma HOUSE ADDICT!</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3650/comment-page-3#comment-635944</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma HOUSE ADDICT!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3650#comment-635944</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or has Season 6 of House been, so far a little pathetic? I just cant take to this &quot;New House&quot; He has very few lines, and is no longer sarcastic and witty, and has lost the general nastiness, we all love. I say bring back House, as he was, no more of this new, boring House, as it truely is an &quot;Epic Fail&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or has Season 6 of House been, so far a little pathetic? I just cant take to this &#8220;New House&#8221; He has very few lines, and is no longer sarcastic and witty, and has lost the general nastiness, we all love. I say bring back House, as he was, no more of this new, boring House, as it truely is an &#8220;Epic Fail&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3650/comment-page-3#comment-635225</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3650#comment-635225</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m astonished by Foreman&#039;s firing Thirteen. Surely sacking someone who&#039;s doing a fine job professionally in order to smooth over your personal relationship with them is unethical and grounds for a lawsuit? Foreman&#039;s basically saying &quot;I would rather dismiss you for no job-related reason than stop sleeping with you&quot;.

Am I missing something there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m astonished by Foreman&#8217;s firing Thirteen. Surely sacking someone who&#8217;s doing a fine job professionally in order to smooth over your personal relationship with them is unethical and grounds for a lawsuit? Foreman&#8217;s basically saying &#8220;I would rather dismiss you for no job-related reason than stop sleeping with you&#8221;.</p>
<p>Am I missing something there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3650/comment-page-3#comment-634637</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3650#comment-634637</guid>
		<description>The writers of House gave Thirteen Huntington&#039;s because it is much more dramatic than if she had Fabry.  Fabry disease can be managed medically (enzyme replacement therapy) and if she had begun treatment early enough - she may never experience any symptoms of her the disease.  There is no way around the Huntington&#039;s affecting her.  All that can be offered is symptom management.  Don&#039;t get me wrong - I would LOVE for Fabry to have a front burner story line like that, as it is a major part of my life but once she begins treatment and her symptoms begin to fade - there is minimal &quot;dramatic&quot; potential.  Just my additional &quot;two cents&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The writers of House gave Thirteen Huntington&#8217;s because it is much more dramatic than if she had Fabry.  Fabry disease can be managed medically (enzyme replacement therapy) and if she had begun treatment early enough &#8211; she may never experience any symptoms of her the disease.  There is no way around the Huntington&#8217;s affecting her.  All that can be offered is symptom management.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; I would LOVE for Fabry to have a front burner story line like that, as it is a major part of my life but once she begins treatment and her symptoms begin to fade &#8211; there is minimal &#8220;dramatic&#8221; potential.  Just my additional &#8220;two cents&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mia</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3650/comment-page-3#comment-634082</link>
		<dc:creator>Mia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3650#comment-634082</guid>
		<description>About Foreman firing Thirteen -- I wonder if what he meant was that he was firing her from the &lt;b&gt;diagnostic department&lt;/b&gt;, with the expectation that she would return to the job she was doing while House was on leave (in the emergency department, I think)?  That would put the &quot;firing&quot; closer to garden-variety stupidity rather than breathtakingly idiotic, as firing her from the hospital altogether would be.

I realize this question will probably be answered in the next episode -- but I haven&#039;t watched it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About Foreman firing Thirteen &#8212; I wonder if what he meant was that he was firing her from the <b>diagnostic department</b>, with the expectation that she would return to the job she was doing while House was on leave (in the emergency department, I think)?  That would put the &#8220;firing&#8221; closer to garden-variety stupidity rather than breathtakingly idiotic, as firing her from the hospital altogether would be.</p>
<p>I realize this question will probably be answered in the next episode &#8212; but I haven&#8217;t watched it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3650/comment-page-3#comment-631754</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3650#comment-631754</guid>
		<description>I was wondering how they would finally get rid of what&#039;s left of the second team (Taub/Thirteen).  For at least two seasons now, the opening credits have never had those actors&#039; names, nor have they shown the characters.  I&#039;ve been wondering when they would admit the second team was an epic fail and go back to formula, with Chase, Foreman and (the always irritating) Cameron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering how they would finally get rid of what&#8217;s left of the second team (Taub/Thirteen).  For at least two seasons now, the opening credits have never had those actors&#8217; names, nor have they shown the characters.  I&#8217;ve been wondering when they would admit the second team was an epic fail and go back to formula, with Chase, Foreman and (the always irritating) Cameron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
