<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday PSA: Superman&#8217;s Code for Buddies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3988/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3988</link>
	<description>a blog of medicine, comics, television, science and other fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:50:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3988/comment-page-1#comment-649651</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3988#comment-649651</guid>
		<description>Well, as Bill said about the comic, he was probably going with the statistically-most-likely choices for his time and place.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as Bill said about the comic, he was probably going with the statistically-most-likely choices for his time and place&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3988/comment-page-1#comment-648589</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3988#comment-648589</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t it Locke who established his reputation as a champion of religious liberty in England of the 1700&#039;s, when he wrote that people of ALL religious beliefs should be accepted and given full rights under the law -- excepting only Catholics, because they acknowledge a foreign prince, and Unitarians, because they deny the Holy Trinity.  I guess it didn&#039;t even occur to him to consider other Holy-Trinity-deniers, such as Jews, Moslems, Buddhists, Hindus, Animists, Atheists, ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t it Locke who established his reputation as a champion of religious liberty in England of the 1700&#8217;s, when he wrote that people of ALL religious beliefs should be accepted and given full rights under the law &#8212; excepting only Catholics, because they acknowledge a foreign prince, and Unitarians, because they deny the Holy Trinity.  I guess it didn&#8217;t even occur to him to consider other Holy-Trinity-deniers, such as Jews, Moslems, Buddhists, Hindus, Animists, Atheists, &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metz77</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3988/comment-page-1#comment-648234</link>
		<dc:creator>Metz77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3988#comment-648234</guid>
		<description>Best to make your message of tolerance palatable to the intolerant, I guess</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best to make your message of tolerance palatable to the intolerant, I guess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3988/comment-page-1#comment-648075</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3988#comment-648075</guid>
		<description>I find it amusing that it mentions tolerance no matter what skin color - but every single person in the strip is white.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it amusing that it mentions tolerance no matter what skin color &#8211; but every single person in the strip is white.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3988/comment-page-1#comment-647890</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3988#comment-647890</guid>
		<description>Why did Superman fly them all the way to Iwo Jima to make that point?  And did he fly them back?  I like to think that he just dumped them in Iwo Jima with no passports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did Superman fly them all the way to Iwo Jima to make that point?  And did he fly them back?  I like to think that he just dumped them in Iwo Jima with no passports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fluffy</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3988/comment-page-1#comment-647886</link>
		<dc:creator>fluffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3988#comment-647886</guid>
		<description>I remember one of the Charlie Brown animated specials involved the Peanuts gang going to a cemetary and looking at all the crosses, and then at one point they saw a star of David grave marker.  They seemed to play it up for laughs, or at least that&#039;s how I remembered it as an easily-offended Jewish kid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember one of the Charlie Brown animated specials involved the Peanuts gang going to a cemetary and looking at all the crosses, and then at one point they saw a star of David grave marker.  They seemed to play it up for laughs, or at least that&#8217;s how I remembered it as an easily-offended Jewish kid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Waters</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3988/comment-page-1#comment-647805</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3988#comment-647805</guid>
		<description>Then again, in the 50s, there was still a significant amount of intolerance for Catholics and Jewish people in the US. When Kennedy ran for President a decade later, there was a stated fear that, since he was Catholic, if he was elected President, he would become a puppet for the Pope. There were also a lot more Catholics and Jews in America at the time, and not a lot of Muslims, Buddhists or followers of other religions, so this marks a first step in the path toward universal tolerance, especially since it uses a type of logic that can be extrapolated to other cases. It&#039;s better than teaching bigotry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then again, in the 50s, there was still a significant amount of intolerance for Catholics and Jewish people in the US. When Kennedy ran for President a decade later, there was a stated fear that, since he was Catholic, if he was elected President, he would become a puppet for the Pope. There were also a lot more Catholics and Jews in America at the time, and not a lot of Muslims, Buddhists or followers of other religions, so this marks a first step in the path toward universal tolerance, especially since it uses a type of logic that can be extrapolated to other cases. It&#8217;s better than teaching bigotry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/3988/comment-page-1#comment-647778</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=3988#comment-647778</guid>
		<description>&quot;Protestant, Jew OR Catholic?&quot; Wow, that&#039;s spreading the net pretty wide...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Protestant, Jew OR Catholic?&#8221; Wow, that&#8217;s spreading the net pretty wide&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

