<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House &#8212; Episode 7 (Season 6): &#8220;Teamwork&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politedissent.com/archives/4019/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/4019</link>
	<description>a blog of medicine, comics, television, science and other fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:37:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: House M.D. &#8211; 6&#215;07 &#8211; Teamwork &#8212; Serialmente</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/4019/comment-page-3#comment-946187</link>
		<dc:creator>House M.D. &#8211; 6&#215;07 &#8211; Teamwork &#8212; Serialmente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=4019#comment-946187</guid>
		<description>[...] giusta prima che sia troppo tardi. Per la cronaca, va detto che la terapia con i vermi è scientificamente riconosciuta. Quello che invece non può essere detto, non con sufficiente certezza, è chi abbia avuto [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] giusta prima che sia troppo tardi. Per la cronaca, va detto che la terapia con i vermi è scientificamente riconosciuta. Quello che invece non può essere detto, non con sufficiente certezza, è chi abbia avuto [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorin Acela</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/4019/comment-page-3#comment-856696</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorin Acela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 22:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=4019#comment-856696</guid>
		<description>&quot;3 out of 4 ain&#039;t bad&quot; is an allusion to Meat Loaf&#039;s hit &quot;Two Out Of Three Ain&#039;t Bad&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;3 out of 4 ain&#8217;t bad&#8221; is an allusion to Meat Loaf&#8217;s hit &#8220;Two Out Of Three Ain&#8217;t Bad&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thor</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/4019/comment-page-3#comment-854659</link>
		<dc:creator>Thor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 05:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=4019#comment-854659</guid>
		<description>As an aside, strongyloides is a very poor choice for management of autoimmune disease via worms; they can cause severe disease if the patient becomes immunocompromised. Moreover, as the worm is autoinfective, patients can be infected for decades without being exposed again. A better choice is something like Necator americanus, which does not proliferate within the host, and does not run the risk of overwhelming the host if there&#039;s autoimmune problems.

Better still is something like TSO (pig whipworm), which cannot colonize humans, but induces a response similar to Necator and Strongyloides. Unfortunately, the patient must continue to consume eggs for as long as is necessary to manage disease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an aside, strongyloides is a very poor choice for management of autoimmune disease via worms; they can cause severe disease if the patient becomes immunocompromised. Moreover, as the worm is autoinfective, patients can be infected for decades without being exposed again. A better choice is something like Necator americanus, which does not proliferate within the host, and does not run the risk of overwhelming the host if there&#8217;s autoimmune problems.</p>
<p>Better still is something like TSO (pig whipworm), which cannot colonize humans, but induces a response similar to Necator and Strongyloides. Unfortunately, the patient must continue to consume eggs for as long as is necessary to manage disease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chetoos</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/4019/comment-page-3#comment-848649</link>
		<dc:creator>Chetoos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 03:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=4019#comment-848649</guid>
		<description>I never understood why Cameron was against Chase having killed the dude, or why they acted like she didnt know. she helped him fake the blood test to give the guy a death sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never understood why Cameron was against Chase having killed the dude, or why they acted like she didnt know. she helped him fake the blood test to give the guy a death sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/4019/comment-page-3#comment-769739</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=4019#comment-769739</guid>
		<description>Several references to Cameron&#039;s myopic self righteousness already, but I&#039;ll add my own 2¢ with the others...

The sanctity of life???  This means you enable a mass murderer to get better so he can go back to defiling the sanctity of life thousands of times over?  This sounds more like the criminals&#039; rights element in society pushing its so-called morality, than an argument for more humanity on the earth.

It&#039;s like the religious types who defend the rights of the perpetrators and evil doers by saying God gives everyone free will, and in so doing blind themselves to the fact that the victims had no rights to THEIR OWN free will.  I mean how many victims out there willed to be abused, raped, murdered, for crying out loud?

Horribly twisted reasoning all around, seems to me.  With the world in such bad shape, I&#039;d say it&#039;s time to change our thinking, and start putting society and the good of others ahead of the “rights” of the deviant individual who acts to the contrary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several references to Cameron&#8217;s myopic self righteousness already, but I&#8217;ll add my own 2¢ with the others&#8230;</p>
<p>The sanctity of life???  This means you enable a mass murderer to get better so he can go back to defiling the sanctity of life thousands of times over?  This sounds more like the criminals&#8217; rights element in society pushing its so-called morality, than an argument for more humanity on the earth.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like the religious types who defend the rights of the perpetrators and evil doers by saying God gives everyone free will, and in so doing blind themselves to the fact that the victims had no rights to THEIR OWN free will.  I mean how many victims out there willed to be abused, raped, murdered, for crying out loud?</p>
<p>Horribly twisted reasoning all around, seems to me.  With the world in such bad shape, I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s time to change our thinking, and start putting society and the good of others ahead of the “rights” of the deviant individual who acts to the contrary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/4019/comment-page-3#comment-741011</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=4019#comment-741011</guid>
		<description>Why does a professional woman have to dress down or demure to have respect and competence? That isn&#039;t a feminist pov. That is the opposite. Cuddy is always covered, but the curves of her character are played up. She shows far less skin than most of the fashions you&#039;ll find on women/girls of any age these days. 

If you want to be disturbed about something, be disturbed about the view that females must have a child to feel complete or successful. 

And I think it is kind of humorous that the character believes it is House who has issues when she&#039;s the one without a relationship all this time, yet she supposedly has none of the mental or control issues, which she believes House to have. 

I&#039;m just relieved some of the endless and heavy handed psychoanalyzing of every character by every other character has been toned down. So much so that if they want to pretend Cameron is acting out of character, despite her past actions, I&#039;m almost willing to forgive and forget because I don&#039;t want it explored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does a professional woman have to dress down or demure to have respect and competence? That isn&#8217;t a feminist pov. That is the opposite. Cuddy is always covered, but the curves of her character are played up. She shows far less skin than most of the fashions you&#8217;ll find on women/girls of any age these days. </p>
<p>If you want to be disturbed about something, be disturbed about the view that females must have a child to feel complete or successful. </p>
<p>And I think it is kind of humorous that the character believes it is House who has issues when she&#8217;s the one without a relationship all this time, yet she supposedly has none of the mental or control issues, which she believes House to have. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just relieved some of the endless and heavy handed psychoanalyzing of every character by every other character has been toned down. So much so that if they want to pretend Cameron is acting out of character, despite her past actions, I&#8217;m almost willing to forgive and forget because I don&#8217;t want it explored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/4019/comment-page-3#comment-740989</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=4019#comment-740989</guid>
		<description>Woohoo! I called Crohn&#039;s from the first scene. Because I might have it and just spent forever reading about symptoms, including uveitis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woohoo! I called Crohn&#8217;s from the first scene. Because I might have it and just spent forever reading about symptoms, including uveitis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nalin</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/4019/comment-page-3#comment-710588</link>
		<dc:creator>Nalin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=4019#comment-710588</guid>
		<description>@Kerrie, @Mani and @Dr.evil

On the subject of House being a genius - I think the writers have said somewhere that House is modeled on another fictional genius - Sherlock Holmes.  

Of course Sherlock Holmes took cocaine, played the violin and just sat in a chair when he had no interesting cases - but he also carried out research into topics such as identifying cigar ash, identifying the soils of different parts of England, coal tar derivatives etc. AND published the results in numerous monographs.  Conan Doyle mentions these things to explain how Holmes has the edge on the police (in addition to being a genius!).  

While House could be reading the literature, publishing, etc. off camera it is a little disappointing that they never seem to show him doing it.  Have they ever shown him leafing through a journal or book when thinking about a tough case (or at least looking at it on the web like people do nowadays)?

In spite of all that I am prepared to accept the show&#039;s portrayal of House as a genius - even if it is the opposite of the genius people that @Kerrie works with.  

I also recall an episode where House remembers a low caste Japanese doctor called in to diagnose him when everyone else is stumped.  He said something like &quot;they kept him because he was always right&quot;.  

I think this is the core of House - he has to keep on being right because otherwise he will not have a reason to exist (which is the same as saying that people will not have a reason to tolerate him).  He pushes the limit of what people will tolerate just to find out what those limits are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kerrie, @Mani and @Dr.evil</p>
<p>On the subject of House being a genius &#8211; I think the writers have said somewhere that House is modeled on another fictional genius &#8211; Sherlock Holmes.  </p>
<p>Of course Sherlock Holmes took cocaine, played the violin and just sat in a chair when he had no interesting cases &#8211; but he also carried out research into topics such as identifying cigar ash, identifying the soils of different parts of England, coal tar derivatives etc. AND published the results in numerous monographs.  Conan Doyle mentions these things to explain how Holmes has the edge on the police (in addition to being a genius!).  </p>
<p>While House could be reading the literature, publishing, etc. off camera it is a little disappointing that they never seem to show him doing it.  Have they ever shown him leafing through a journal or book when thinking about a tough case (or at least looking at it on the web like people do nowadays)?</p>
<p>In spite of all that I am prepared to accept the show&#8217;s portrayal of House as a genius &#8211; even if it is the opposite of the genius people that @Kerrie works with.  </p>
<p>I also recall an episode where House remembers a low caste Japanese doctor called in to diagnose him when everyone else is stumped.  He said something like &#8220;they kept him because he was always right&#8221;.  </p>
<p>I think this is the core of House &#8211; he has to keep on being right because otherwise he will not have a reason to exist (which is the same as saying that people will not have a reason to tolerate him).  He pushes the limit of what people will tolerate just to find out what those limits are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landman</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/4019/comment-page-3#comment-708832</link>
		<dc:creator>Landman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=4019#comment-708832</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t her fault that the &quot;attempt&quot; didn&#039;t work out. As far as I recall, she even said that it was fun as long as it lasted. And anyway, it seems unlikely that the small falling out that resulted from it would&#039;ve cost her to regret it. More to the point, if it was such a horrible experience, why wasn&#039;t it mentioned in this episode? Maybe the writers were hoping that, what happens in season three stays in season three.

Also, Chase seemed to take the opposite position in relation to the one he previously had. He admitted looking around every once in a while because he&#039;s &quot;a guy&quot;. Assuming that &quot;look around&quot; means that he feels tempted to break his commitment to monogamous relationship, one could wonder whether he has had a change of heart too or does he just fall in love with all those pretty girls he sees around?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t her fault that the &#8220;attempt&#8221; didn&#8217;t work out. As far as I recall, she even said that it was fun as long as it lasted. And anyway, it seems unlikely that the small falling out that resulted from it would&#8217;ve cost her to regret it. More to the point, if it was such a horrible experience, why wasn&#8217;t it mentioned in this episode? Maybe the writers were hoping that, what happens in season three stays in season three.</p>
<p>Also, Chase seemed to take the opposite position in relation to the one he previously had. He admitted looking around every once in a while because he&#8217;s &#8220;a guy&#8221;. Assuming that &#8220;look around&#8221; means that he feels tempted to break his commitment to monogamous relationship, one could wonder whether he has had a change of heart too or does he just fall in love with all those pretty girls he sees around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/4019/comment-page-3#comment-702658</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 06:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politedissent.com/?p=4019#comment-702658</guid>
		<description>Her attempt at unentangled sex didn&#039;t exactly work out if you recall.  Realizing your past ideas were wrong is not hypocrisy.  And if it is, there are far worse things than being a hypocrite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her attempt at unentangled sex didn&#8217;t exactly work out if you recall.  Realizing your past ideas were wrong is not hypocrisy.  And if it is, there are far worse things than being a hypocrite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

