Comments on: The Bowlderized World Watch #3

By: Scott

Scott — Thu, 03 Feb 2005 03:39:31 +0000

Ha! You tried to trap me with your clever words! Actually, he loaned me the first three issue saying that “I had to read what could possibly be the worst comic ever published, even worse than the new X-Force.” I’m not sure it’s that bad, but very close.

By: David Oakes

David Oakes — Wed, 02 Feb 2005 23:12:42 +0000

Ok, so the first issue was a “loner”. What’s your excuse for the next two?

(And no “Better than Chuck Austen’s excuse, I am sure” – while true – is not an acceptable answer.)

By: N

Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:43:05 +0000

I do’t even know what Worldwatch is. I never heard of it til just now, looking at this site.

I don’t wanna know.

By: Guy LeCharles Gonzalez

Guy LeCharles Gonzalez — Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:37:14 +0000

LOL! Perfect. I reviewed this issue a while back, when I’d mistakenly picked it up thinking it was some edgy indie twist on the Avengers. PURE CRAP! Oddly enough, it seems a good 10-15% of my traffic any given week is from people searching for Worldwatch. WTF?!?!