<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outsiders #26:  A Medical Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politedissent.com/archives/878/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/878</link>
	<description>a blog of medicine, comics, television, science and other fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:50:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.politedissent.com/archives/878/comment-page-1#comment-851366</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politedissent.com/archives/878#comment-851366</guid>
		<description>10 kg of uranium may be the same mass as a full-term pregnancy. Volumetrically, it&#039;s much less noticeable: its high density means it would only take up about half a liter of space... more than one normal-sized soft drink can, but considerably less than two of them (and you wouldn&#039;t want all the uranium in one lump until you&#039;re ready for it to go off anyway).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 kg of uranium may be the same mass as a full-term pregnancy. Volumetrically, it&#8217;s much less noticeable: its high density means it would only take up about half a liter of space&#8230; more than one normal-sized soft drink can, but considerably less than two of them (and you wouldn&#8217;t want all the uranium in one lump until you&#8217;re ready for it to go off anyway).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

