Batman — Jekyll & Hyde #6: A Medical Review
Batman: Jekyll & Hyde #6
Paul Jenkins, writer
Sean Phillips, penciler
Two-Face has gone crazy — crazier than normal, that is. He is blaming his misdeeds on his dead brother Murray. To remedy the situation, he takes a pistol and tries to shoot off the evil half of his face.
Unsurprisingly, he ends up in the hospital:
Commissioner Gordon: He blew half his face off — the “Murray” side…The bullet clipped the occipital lobe area of his brain and lodged under his skull.
Looking at the image of Two-Face shooting himself , it does appear that he is trying to shoot the left half of his face off (or at least give himself a Bruce Campbell chin). How then did he injure his occipital lobe, which is the very back part of the brain? To hit the occipital lobe directly, he would need to be aiming the pistol differently than he was. Artistic or writer error is always a possibility. Another possibility is that he was using a fairly low velocity weapon. In that case, the bullet would have enough power to enter the skull, but not enough power to break through a second time and exit. The bullet would then ricochet around inside the skull until it finally runs out of velocity, injuring the occipital lobe in the process. Commissioner Gordon’s words seem to suggest this, and there is no obvious exit wound in the art, so I suspect that this is the mechanism of injury.

Take a close look at the hospital scene reproduced in the upper right. How many errors can you spot? I count four.
|
ANSWERS: (Highlight with the mouse to reveal) 1. How many hoses does one face mask need? Four is way too many. (And you could probably argue that he should have been intubated in the first place.) 2. He was shot in the head. Why does he need that big tube and contraption over his heart. And what exactly is that contraption? 3. An EEG lead on the cheek is useless. 4. Speaking of useless EEG leads, how about those on top of the bandages. |

November 6th, 2005 at 4:31 am
Isn’t that thing over his heart the remote control for adjusting the bed ?
;-)
The head bandage should be considered a fifth error, since it is very poorly attached (at a rakish angle more befitting a cap!).
It probably would not be that kind of bandage these days, more likely a tubular one.
But that’s just me being overly pedantic.
I was a bit disappointed with the resolution of the Harvey/Murray invention, but I’d best re-read all six before commenting.
November 11th, 2008 at 2:51 am
It’s not precisely an error, but what is he lying on?
Leave a Reply